
I never did think that I was a modern art person. It interests me, no doubt, but it doesn't make my jaw drop. Then I went to the Reina Sofia Museum in Madrid.
And it didn't make my jaw drop. But it made me realise, that wasn't the point.
Modern art doesn't make you look at it in awe because you're not supposed to do so. Often, because a painting is so majestic, you are totally overwhelmed by it. And that's all you ever are. You can't connect to it, because it's up there and you are just minuscule in front of it. It makes you value that precious talent the painters seem to possess.
Modern or post modern art doesn't do that. I am not going to admire the fine lines or the how the light falls on the face. I can't, because I can't figure out where the face is!
But, yes, it did broaden my perspective about what art is. For me, Renaissance art is real art. But it might not be feasible to some extent now because of photography. So, what works now?
I have absolutely no idea. Picasso is great, Dali makes sense, but what else? I need more time to look at them and work on it. An hour or two just isn't enough. I think modern art is not just about looking at paintings and passing by. You need to stand there, and actually think about it. Not analyse it, just think.
That's when viewing art becomes a satisfying act.
The artist has realised his creativity, his energy is spent and is over with. So, what's left is the viewer. The viewer needs to be able to look beyond the beauty of the painting and see what it says or what it is trying to say.
Only then, I believe, viewing art is worthwhile. Otherwise, it's just a waste of time.